Both of these pistols are definitely Goldilocks guns; they're small enough to pack on a daily basis but big enough to use as a duty gun, competition gun, whatever you want. These guns are very alike in many ways. The frames are polymer, so they're fairly light. There's a rail for lasers or lights. Aftermarket support abounds. Both are accurate, reliable, affordable and very available. However, the operating systems are quite different. Will that make one better for the average Joe than the other?
The P07 is a 21st century version update of CZ's classic format, a hammer-fired double-action semi-auto pistol. The slide still rides inside the frame rails, so lock-up is tight but the frame is changed to polymer instead of steel or alloy.
CZ vs GLOCK !
As a result, the slide got a little fatter compared to the CZ 75 family of pistols. Specs consist of a 3. The frame is about an inch wide, so the girth is in the ambidextrous controls as it has ambi decocking levers or manual safety levers. CZ's Omega trigger system lets you change the gun from a manual safety to a decocker and back if you so desire; this lets you drop the hammer or carry cocked-and-locked if you so choose.
The frame has a full-length dust cover with a rail, so you can use an attachment if you so chose. The grip housing has swappable backstraps, with a couple different sizes of palm swell you can choose from.
Glock 19 VS CZ P 09
There is stippling on the back, front and sides of the grip for texture. Some other appointments include an oversized trigger guard, which is undercut, and a medium-ish beavertail on the frame. This gives you a high, tight and comfortable grip.The shooting world is seemingly still overrun with 9mm, striker-fired, polymer-based, semi-automatic pistols.
The P10c was first in the line of several weapons carrying the P10 name. After the success of the P10c, CZ came out with the P10s for subcompact and the P10f for full-size in Wink wink, nudge nudge.
The concept behind these was pretty straightforward: CZ makes good weapons, and it was looking for a way to break into the synthetic-materials market. However, due to low sales numbers, they were both discontinued around To their credit, CZ decided to go about it a different way, releasing the compact version first. This way, they let shooters know they were about now, and what it is they had in store for the future. It was kind of refreshing, in a way. An optics-ready OR version of the P10 series is now available, spanking new for Machined mounting plates, option for co-witness, and the fact that the OR versions are made right here in the US — these all contribute to the likeability of these newer models.
Another difference is that the mag release button has been improved on. A downside is that the mag release is no longer ambi, and that the interchangeability of magazines is not guaranteed. Also available are the suppressor ready versions, which include a threaded barrel and higher night sights.
Since the P10c was designed to compete head-on with the Glock 19the build is pretty similar. It is polymer-based, glass fiber-reinforced, striker-fired, and it has a stainless steel slide. Designed inthe company worked on it for a while, releasing it in As one poignant forum-writer put it: this thing took everything that was good about the Glock 19 and made it better.
That said, I personally do not feel there is something which makes the P10c a significantly better weapon than the Glock You want that natural feel, decent accuracy, high capacity, with the option of hiding it in plain sight.Forums New posts Search forums.
Media New media New comments Search media. Members Registered members Current visitors New profile posts Search profile posts. Range Map. Support TGT.
CZ P10c Review
Log in Register. Search titles only. Search Advanced search….
May 2, 1 1. I have recently been thinking about selling my glock 19 gen 3 in order to get a CZ P07 and was wondering if anyone had experience with the Cz. Now dont get me wrong I love the glock but I just dont feel comfortable with it in my hand, because to be honest I dont have the largest hands and it can be uncomfortable to grip it.
The Glock 19 is thee gun when it comes to finding the right balance between a duty weapon and a concealed carry pistol. One stand out in the compact pistols realm is the CZ P C.
The CZ is a lot like the Glock 19; they're both polymer-framed, striker-fired pistols from legendary companies. Comparing the standard factory models of each gun - no special editions or custom models - here's how they break down:. These guns are not the smallest and considerably more significant in size than popular carry guns like the Sig Sauer P and Springfield Armory Hellcat.
With that in mind, they are still relatively easy to conceal in well-made, reliable holsters. These compact pistols also large enough to fulfill the role of home defense gun. Both feature rail systems to accommodate lights and lasers, as well as optic cut options for those looking to take that route. Compact pistols are easier to reload, have a longer sight radius, and have less recoil and muzzle rise than smaller pocket-sized guns.
Both the Glock 19 Gen 5 and the CZ P C are designed to hold a standard 15 round magazine plus 1 round in the chamber and both are excellent guns for a wide variety of tasks, so here's how they stack up against each other:. Firearms with the ability to mount an optic are becoming all the rage these days. They make you faster, more precise, and give a clear advantage over iron sights.
Compact pistols have a shorter sight radius, but a mounted red dot removes that an issue altogether. The Glock 19 MOS gun does give you a lot more options for optics, as it comes with four plates to accommodate about a dozen optics. Both compact pistols come with front and rear serrations, a Picatinny rail, ambidextrous slide locks, and a trigger with built-in safety. Neither gun has a manual safety. The Glock 19 has a reversible magazine button, but the P C has an ambidextrous magazine release.
The sights on the CZ are metal, much more durable, and are easy to use right out of the box. The CZ P C comes with a flat face trigger, which has less reach than a curved trigger and offers more control. The CZ P C trigger is crisper, cleaner, and overall the trigger you would otherwise pay extra money to slap into a Glock. Ergonomics are always a mixed bag and unless they are weird or vastly different, they will be more or less up the end-user. One of the more common Glock upgrades is stippling the frame.
The CZ P C has a very aggressive and rough grip texture that sticks to your hand exceptionally well. The aggressive texture of the CZ grip can be slightly uncomfortable when it rubs against the body when carried IWB and bother shooters who have an exceptionally tight grip.
The magazine and slide release are much larger and more comfortable to engage.Gun technology today has grown in leaps and bounds. The trend is to build lighter, compact, modern-looking, efficient, reliable weapons.
Both the Glock 19 and CZ P09 have their ups and downs, so I wanted to put them up against each other. They have certain similarities and are often compared together. They also have certain distinct differences. Either would be a good choice. Just a small blurb about myself: I am an army combat vet and I volunteered with the police for 7 years.
I have carried a pistol daily for nearly half my life. My style of shooting is very much geared towards combat, fast and lethal. While I currently own and carry a Glock 19 gen 4 and shoot it almost weekly- I have seen the CZ P on the range I go to, and it is also a popularly purchased gun there. This is my reaction based upon feel and experience.
Like many modern pistols, both guns have lower-half polymer frames, enabling less weight than the all-metal guns like the SIG Sauer P Both are a stark black color. The slide of the Glock is flat on top and of the CZ slightly rounded. On the CZ, the slide rides inside the frame rails rather than outside. Though some shooters, myself included, do not care for the reduced surface area with which to manipulate the slide and instinctively sight, this unusually tight slide-to-frame fit enables a very efficient barrel lockup, providing exceptional accuracy.
In holding the front ribs to rack the slide you winds up covering the ejector port which could cause stoppages. The handle is similar and on both guns, and with the generation 4 Glock the back-strap can be changed to adjust for different sized hands, giving the same benefit as the adjustable CZ.
Both have Picattiny rails for a laser or flashlight attachment, and both guns are totally reliable. Both supply full 9mm power, though the CZ does have an additional 4 bullets in the magazine and that is certainly nothing to sneeze at.
This is the main reason for the size and weight difference between the two weapons, and in order to accommodate such a magazine, the CZ-P had to be larger and not as comfortable to carry concealed within the waistband.
Both have nice sized magazine release buttons. That has never been a critical issue for me, but I thought I would add it as another CZ benefit. Both have textured handles, the handle of the CZ being a bit longer which sat better a bit in my large hand. I personally counter the handle length by adding a heel to my Glock 19 magazines because of my wide fingers. For me it is a perfect fix and it is very comfortable. A nice feature on the Glock is the grooves on the handle for the fingers.
The grooves insure the same hand hold every time and give a more steady hand hold. The CZ does not have any handle grooves. The Glock is striker fired and does not have a visible hammer. Each squeeze of the Glock is crisp and the same. I live in a bad area and for me, reaction time is critical- there is virtually no reaction time when someone jumps you.
There is no shortage of 9mm handguns with polymer frames and all the modern accouterments. The biggest name has been and most likely will remain to be Glock. Glock was a big trendsetter that helped moved the industry forward into polymer frames and striker-fired guns. Glock Safe Action Pistols have been massively successful and now serve in dozens of militaries, hundreds of police forces, and millions of civilians. Seriously millions, the Glock 43 itself has sold over a million units.
So who can step to the king? What about the CZ P09? The most obvious difference is the way these guns work. The Glock 17 is a striker-fired gun operating with a partially cocked striker.
When the trigger is pulled, the striker is fully cocked, then released and the weapon is fired. After the first shot is fired, the hammer will remain to the rear, making it a single-action weapon with a shorter, lighter trigger pull.
Is striker-fired better than hammer-fired? What we can talk about is the quality of their triggers and compare them within their respective systems. The CZ trigger is long and heavy on the first shot, no way to get past that. However, the single-action trigger does leave something to be desired. There is substantial pretravel for a single action trigger.
The reset is also very long for a single action firearm. I updated mine with a Cajun Works trigger years ago to fix these problems and I've been pleased with it ever since. The reset is short, tactile, and audible. My main complaint is the plastic trigger and trigger safety. After replacing it with a trigger from Suarez industries, the problem was corrected.
CZ P07 or Glock 19
When comparing stock triggers, the G17 is definitely more pleasing.That's going to be a fun one to watch. Georgia, I'm going with Georgia to beat Oklahoma just because of my cousin (Nick Chubb). That leaves Georgia vs. Clemson in the national championship game. Out of that one, UGA. See that Chubb name with the national championship trophy. I don't think anyone is going to be able to run the ball consistently on them. I've watched Clemson a lot. They're fun to watch.
They didn't want us to be here so let's tell them why we're here. I know I'd have a little edge about me if they didn't want me to be in there. Then we get in there and we're playing Clemson, the team we lost to in the final minutes last year.
I'd have a little edge about. I at least think they'll beat Clemson. I think coach (Dabo) Swinney has done a great job with the culture there to do what he's done in a relatively short period of time just winning ballgames and staying on top. Clemson is looking good as well. College football is crazy, man. Anybody can be beat on any given day so you have to hold onto your seat and watch what happens. I have my guy, Dexter Lawrence at Clemson. We played high school ball together so I have to go with Clemson.
I watched them play all the time, Georgia, I've seen them play all the time. There are a lot of good teams in there right now. I'm a Georgia Dawg. I see them on TV and see what kind of players they have.
I think whoever wins that game will go on. They have the experience of being in the playoff so I think that would be my guess. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Alabama Media Group.
The picks with the winning team in bold at the top of each prediction: Champion: Georgia "I'm thinking heavy on Georgia because they're a hard fighting team and they have a bunch of guys on that team that can make plays when it's called their way. Oklahoma "One reason: Baker Mayfield.
Clemson "They're ranked first in defensive efficiency and their defensive line is unbelievable. Clemson "Well my brother is a linebacker at Clemson, so I have to go with them, for his sake.Glock 19 5th Gen Vs CZ P10C
Georgia "Georgia, all the way. View Comments About Us About Alabama Media Group Jobs at Alabama Media Group Advertise with us News In Education Frequently Asked Questions About AL. Manage your subscription Delivery feedback Place a vacation hold Make a payment Customer Service Place an ad Get home delivery Promote your event in our calendar Send us an email Submit a news tip Buy newspaper front pages, poster and more AL.
Move cursor over product parameter name to display the graphic -- click to enlarge. Links to these same products are also available below.